If the wireless network in the world is divided into two halves, half of which must be as bright as the example of clashes between 3G, while the other half is as quiet as the water gently WiFi. Compared to high-profile 3G, WiFi in the world is always so calm, so the alarm, but that calm does not mean that WiFi in silence, it is ready, waiting for overnight success.
Then in 2009 what the world highlights WiFi? The answer is the 150M, as the IEEE 802.11n standard rate under a standard, it appears not only broke the WiFi world peace, to break the monopoly of 300M. 150M capabilities then what? It is not a lot of people in the "non-mainstream" speed standards? We will duel it 300M to tell you the answer, to tell you who is the king of cost-11n world.
Rectification of names for the 150M it is definitely not "non-mainstream"
150M really is a "non-mainstream" it? Is not true, although many users of traditional values, 802.11n represents the 300M, 300M also represents the 11n, but this is not true, according to IEEE official description, 11n standard was actually For four speed grades, that is, 150M, 300M, 450M and 600M, 150M so that is definitely not "non-mainstream."
150M has been the rectification of names, it's the actual performance of what? It how big the gap 300M? 150M and 300M Who is more worth buying? The answer will duel in the following test revealed for you 11.
The duel will be divided into entry-level product duel, the mainstream level and enterprise-level products products duel duel. In each duel, 150M and 300M will be a wireless router as representatives of parties to participate. Rate test items include single-threaded test, multi-threaded rate testing, and proficiency test signal through walls.
Single, multi-threaded test: We will test this by NetIQ Chariot software, wireless routing, single entry (more) pair throughput capacity, with intuitive data show their strength.
Wall proficiency test: we also by NetIQ Chariot software to test, but in the test side and wireless routing separated by a load-bearing walls.
Successful completion of preparatory work, like the wonderful example of clashes between test immediately start, the first duel: the entry-level. Entry-level duel: FAST FW150R VS TP-LINK TL-WR841N
150M Representative: FAST FW150R
FAST FW150R is a quick launch of its latest 150M wireless router, its body is very small, the overall design simple and fashionable; it supports the IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps . With its strength, it is rapidly becoming the entry-level leader in the 150M wireless router. Market Price: 108 yuan
300M Representative: TP-LINK TL-WR841N
TP-LINK TL-WR841N wireless router set wired / wireless in one, the overall shape the same simple fashion; it is consistent with IEEE 802.11n (draft standard), IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, the maximum wireless transfer rate up to 300Mbps; it 300M wireless router is the entry-level representatives of the classic. Market Price: 215 yuan
Vs. single-threaded test start:
FW150R: 60.360Mbps TL-WR841N: 59.334Mbps
FW150R: 74.123Mbps TL-WR841N: 78.362Mbps
FW150R: 25.404Mbps TL-WR841N: 34.362Mbps
Summary: Gap 150M little more cost-effective
Comparison test by the three we can see, 150M and 300M for the overall gap is very small, even in single-threaded test results over the 300M, 150M's performance is excellent. On the whole, 150M 300M product's performance is about 90% of the product, the price of the former is only 50% of the latter, cost-effective at a glance. Therefore, the duel in the entry-level products, 150M win. Vs. flow-level products: Tenda W311R VS ASUS RT-N11 +
150M: Tenda W311R
Tenda W311R's a classic 150M wireless router, which uses both gray and white color design, stylish looks generous, modern full. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps. Since its launch, it has been a majority of the customers and become one of the products of choice for mainstream users. Market Price: 130 yuan
ASUS RT-N11 +
ASUS RT-N11 + is the latest of a 300M wireless router, which uses the white of the design style, demonstrates the high-end products temperament; it supports the IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards; Because of its superior performance, it is available soon on board the "speed king" of the throne and become the absolute representative of 300M. Market Price: 285 yuan
Vs. single-threaded test start:
W311R: 53.417Mbps RT-N11 +: 72.675Mbps
W311R: 79.237Mbps RT-N11 +: 89.434Mbps
W311R: 25.620Mbps RT-N11 +: 33.328Mbps
Summary: 300M 150M strength was more cost-effective
Comparison test in the mainstream products, we see a strong representative 300M strength, ASUS RT-N11 +'s performance does have a good style of the King. Tenda W311R with it, but the gap is not too great, one of only a difference of up to 19Mbps, the same satisfactory performance, taking into account the W311R price of only 130 yuan, the same cost advantage is obvious. Therefore, the duel of the mainstream products, 150M of the cost the same than 300M. Vs. Enterprise Product: Belkin F6D4230zh4 VS NETGEAR WNR2000
F6D4230zh4 is Belkin's of a classic 150M wireless router, which uses a piano paint, frosted panel, and feel very good material, when people first get our hands on a kind of love the feel. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b and other standards, theoretical maximum data transfer rate of 150Mbps. Since its launch, it has by virtue of superior performance by the many high-end enterprise-class users of all ages, a classic market. Market Price: 398 yuan
WNR2000 NETGEAR's is an "alternative" in the 300M wireless router, which uses black piano paint materials, which is the traditional "white gold family" style is completely different. Although the appearance has changed, but it still maintains the performance advantages of NETGEAR in the industry, working with NETGEAR products also uphold the fine. It supports IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g / b standard, the maximum theoretical transfer rate of 300Mbps. Its overall performance is outstanding, you can easily respond to the diverse needs of enterprise customers. Market Price: 550
Vs. single-threaded test start:
F6D4230zh4: 51.319Mbps WNR2000: 65.250Mbps
F6D4230zh4: 52.076Mbps WNR2000: 87.322Mbps
F6D4230zh4: 27.438Mbps WNR2000: 33.328Mbps
Summary: very cost-effective performance are excellent
Enterprise-class products in the test, 150M and 300M fierce competition until the final winner of a failed test, both performed satisfactorily. For small business-class customers, Belkin F6D4230zh4 is definitely a good choice; while for medium and large enterprise users, the NETGEAR WNR2000 is the best partner. Comprehensive view, in this round duel, 150M and 300M to fight and.
Summary: 150M subtle performance the best choice for home users
After three rounds of the confrontation, we want to applaud the performance of 150M wonderful product, although it is less than 300M products in terms of speed, but the gap is very small with the overall performance of the product can reach 300M 80%, this performance is indeed praiseworthy; 150M product that taking into account the low price (about 300M price of 50%), can be said that 150M is a well-deserved cost 11n king. 11n be popular in the era of modern family if you are a user, if you are in need of a wireless network products that 150M is definitely your best choice because it is the new "king of cost-effective."
Shenzhen Julong Year Launched China's First Six-generation LCD Line
comparison Help TOOLS
Audio Video Tools Expert
Dreamweaver MX 2004 from scratch (7)
MOD to MPG
Six appliances giant collective diving below 37-inch LCD TV million related
Community 2.0 My Community I Call The Shots
Semiconductor India vied with New Deal
Farewell, annoying pop-up window
Jackie Chan and Jet Li's ad war
DAT To MP4
Zlib dll not found error repairing tool